Legal Opinion

Savage v. Monarch Royalty Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1933No. 726PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

The appellant filed his claim for $37,-716.60 with the Receiver of the Monarch Royalty Corporation. The Receiver protested its allowance on the ground that the claim *651was founded on a scheme to defraud the stockholders of the corporation, was ultra vires and contrary to public policy. The issues were referred to a master who made a report which includes a summary of the testimony, a running comment thereon, some observations on the applicable law, two short conclusions of fact, and a conclusion of law that the claim, should be disallowed. To this report exceptions were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheffield & Birmingham Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Allen v. Commercial Nat. Bank of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  3. Sandford v. EmbryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  4. Fleitmann v. John M. Stone Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911
  5. Thomson Mach. Co. v. SternbergDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Badger By-Products Co. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974
  2. United States v. Seaboard Citizens Nat. Bank of NorfolkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  3. Maloney v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API