Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sterling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 8, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant, a construction worker, performed work for one of the employer’s customers on his own time. When claimant refused to turn over to the employer the payment he had received, he was discharged. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that claimant had lost his employment due to misconduct. We affirm. A claimant who has acted in a way that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Claim of VelazquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re the Claim of Jedrak-PerzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GewirtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of BilkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of BilkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API