Legal Opinion

In re Claim of Velazquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 4, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant, who worked as a cleaner in a supermarket, was discharged for not following his supervisor’s instructions. Initially, it was determined that claimant was entitled to unemployment insurance benefits. The employer then requested a hearing contending that claimant should be disqualified from receiving benefits because he lost his job through misconduct.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BernetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. In re the Claim of Di DonatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Broad Elm Auto Centers, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of AbbottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. In re the Claim of JoynerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API