Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Gewirtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 26, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a drug store pharmacist after an investigation revealed that he filled several hundred dollars worth of prescriptions for a store security guard without ringing them through the cash register, charging the co-payment or billing the security guard’s insurance company. Although claimant testified that he was unable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of NaraineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of BlaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of HawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Claim of BilkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AdornoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of CervoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API