Legal Opinion

Halverson v. Elsberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1938No. 31,600PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

This is a special proceeding under L. 1933, c. 352, § 14, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1936 Supp. § 2720-136, to obtain a license to drive a motor vehicle upon the highways of the state after his license had been revoked as a consequence of applicant’s conviction of driving when drunk. There is no dispute as to facts. Halverson had a driver’s license when, in September, at a general term of the district court in Becker county, this state, he was convicted of having, on April 18, 1934, driven a motor vehicle in said county while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He served 30 of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Watson v. Division of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Garford Trucking, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Giacomo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Martinka v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Aslakson v. State Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Ausman v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Springborg v. WILSON & CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API