Legal Opinion

Aslakson v. State Department of Highways

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1944No. 33,696PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Respondent was awarded compensation for personal injuries sustained while engaged in cleaning the tail-gate on his truck as arising out of and in the course of his employment. The question for decision is whether the evidence sustains a finding that he was an employe rather than an independent contractor.

In May 1942, respondent was hired by the state highway department under what is called a “Rental Agreement For Truck And Operator,” by the terms of which he agreed to furnish the truck and operate it himself personally, or furnish an operator satisfactory to the department,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ausman v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. Halverson v. ElsbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Rolfsmeyer v. RauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Michels v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Interstate Air-Parts, Inc. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Berthiaume v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Interstate, Etc. v. M.-St. P. M. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Huber v. Hennepin County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Huber v. Hennepin County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API