Transportation Insurance Co. v. Maksyn
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
The question presented is whether Joe J. Maksyn’s “anxiety depression” qualified as a compensable occupational disease within the meaning of article 8306, section 20, Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated. The trial court rendered judgment on a jury verdict for Maksyn for total and permanent incapacity and the court of civil appeals has affirmed. 567 S.W.2d 845. We reverse the judgment and render judgment that plaintiff take nothing, because section 20, as amended to be effective August 30, 1971, affords coverage for repetitious physical, but not for repetitious mental…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hood v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- Bailey v. American General Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Texas Water Commission v. Brushy Creek Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- McAlister v. Medina Electric Cooperative, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.