Legal Opinion
Lilly v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 31, 1995No. C6-94-1583, CX-94-1585PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.
This case involves a confrontation between a home rule charter city’s exercise of power in light of a state statute. Appellants, the City of Minneapolis and five city employees, challenge a judgment that permanently enjoins the city from providing health insurance benefits for city employees’ same sex domestic partners and blood relatives not authorized to receive such benefits under Minn. Stat. § 471.61 (1992).1 We affirm on grounds that, although it is a home rule charter city, the City of Minneapolis does not have the power to grant employee health care…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Baker v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City Of Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Tyma v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- City of Atlanta v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Johnson v. City Of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Advantage Media, LLC v. City of Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.