Legal Opinion
Calmar, Inc. v. Emson Research, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 22, 1994No. CV 92-4770 DT (JGx)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING EMSON’S MOTION TO AMEND ITS ANSWER; ORDER DENYING EMSON’S MOTION TO BIFURCATE TRIAL OF THE ISSUE OF WILLFULNESS AND TO STAY DISCOVERY OF RELATED ATTORNEY OPINIONS; ORDER GRANTING EMSON’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TEVRIZIAN, District Judge.
Background
This action arises out of an alleged patent infringement. Defendant Emson Research, Inc. (“Emson”) alleges it has been making the accused pump sprayers (a ball type PMP pump sprayer which “burp” down the dip tube) since at least 1981.
On August 7, 1992, Plaintiff Calmar, Inc. (“Calmar”) brought the instant action against…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Slaven v. BP America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Cybiotronics, Ltd. v. Golden Source Electronics, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Myspace, Inc. v. Graphon CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.