Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
[[Image here]]
[[Image here]]
SPATT, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
In years past, a person with an arthritic hip was generally relegated to a wheelchair. The advent of modern medical prosthesis technology now permits such a person to walk and resume a normal life through the use of an artificial socket, ball and neck of the hip joint, known as a hip implant prosthesis or femoral prosthesis. Today, the manufacture and supply of prosthetic devices is a growing and profitable industry. The marketing of such devices is estimated to have generated $2.2…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stryker Corporation and Osteonics Corporation v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc., and Marli Medical Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Pall Corp. v. PTI Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. TURA LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.