Legal Opinion

People v. Matula

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1959No. Crim. 6478PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant Matula appeals from the judgment of conviction of perjury (Pen. Code, § 118) and from the order denying his motion for new trial.

In October 1955, Matula was called as a witness at hearings held by the Assembly Interim Committee on Governmental Efficiency and Economy. Matula was secretary-treasurer of Local 396 of the Teamsters’ Union, which included many drivers of rubbish trucks and also checkers at rubbish dumps in the Los Angeles area. The committee’s questioning of Matula concerned his activities as a union officer and the activities of his union. In particular, many questions…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Barenblatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. People v. BeeslyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. HedgecockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. KobrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. AnstineIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. GilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API