Legal Opinion
Case v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1925No. 4516PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The single question presented on the writ of error is whether the indictment is so fatally defective that the court below erred in denying the motion in arrest of judgment and in entering judgment upon the verdict of-the jury. It is contended that the indictment is defective for its failure to set forth the facts constituting the fraud and deception alleged to have been practiced by the defendant, and reliance is placed upon the rule of pleading which requires that an indictment shall not only be sufficient to inform the accused that he is charged with a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bartell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Capone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- United States v. Nicholas CrowderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Gray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.