Ciba Corp. v. Weinberger
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Petitioner manufactures a drug called Ritonic Capsules † for which it filed a new drug application (NDA) that became effective in 1959. Under the Act then in force, an NDA for a “new drug” required the manufacturer to submit to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adequate proof of the drug's safety. This particular NDA became effective on the basis of the drug’s safety. As we have noted in the companion cases, the 1962 amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1040, as amended, 76 Stat. 780, directed FDA to withdraw approval for NDA’s which became effective…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
3Cited by62 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Biotics Research Corporation v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc., Seroyal Brands, Inc. v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- McNeilab, Inc. v. American Home Products Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Almeida v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.