Legal Opinion

Ciba Corp. v. Weinberger

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 1973No. 72-528PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Petitioner manufactures a drug called Ritonic Capsules † for which it filed a new drug application (NDA) that became effective in 1959. Under the Act then in force, an NDA for a “new drug” required the manufacturer to submit to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adequate proof of the drug's safety. This particular NDA became effective on the basis of the drug’s safety. As we have noted in the companion cases, the 1962 amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1040, as amended, 76 Stat. 780, directed FDA to withdraw approval for NDA’s which became effective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Biotics Research Corporation v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc., Seroyal Brands, Inc. v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. McNeilab, Inc. v. American Home Products Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  5. Almeida v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API