Legal Opinion
Smith v. Rezutek
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 2024No. 113635PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Smith v. Rezutek,
2024-Ohio-5599.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA MICHAEL SMITH, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 113635 v. : PAUL REZUTEK, ET AL., : Defendants-Appellees. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: November 27, 2024 Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-23-982507 Appearances: Michael Smith, pro se. Law Office of Edward Fadel, LLC, and Edward Fadel, for appellee Paul Rezutek. Law Offices of Terrence J. Kenneally & Associates Co., Kirk E. Roman, and Sean M. Kenneally;…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Industrial RelationsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Harmon v. Philip Morris, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lakewood v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Ellis v. Setjo, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Autovest, L.L.C. v. HicksOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- 114476Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Galloway v. Garmon, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025