Legal Opinion

In re Peltz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice law in this State in March, 1952, and is charged with professional misconduct. Upon receipt of complaints this matter was sent to Steuben County Bar Association for investigation. Following the taking of testimony by its Grievance Committee, which was reported to this court, we appointed an attorney to conduct a preliminary investigation. At the hearings which consumed several days the testimony of various witnesses was taken, including a lengthy examination of respondent. The preliminary investigation resulted in 729 pages of testimony, 584 exhibits and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. In re BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. In re RopieckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. In re PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. In re MenzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Jerome Hafter v. Ruth Farkas and Jonathan FarkasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. The Fund Of Funds, Limited v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Grunberg v. FellerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  5. Raphael v. ShapiroNew York Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API