Raphael v. Shapiro
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter Tom, J.
The parties in the submitted motions raise a sensitive issue as to whether an attorney should be permitted to sell his interest in an ongoing law practice.
Plaintiff Sheldon R. Raphael (Raphael) and Edward I. Friedman are the law partners and sole shareholders of the law firm Friedman & Raphael, P. C. (Law Firm). In or about *921March 1990, Raphael decided to withdraw from the practice of law and the two lawyers entered into an agreement with defendant Phillip E. Shapiro (Shapiro), an attorney, to sell Raphael’s interest in the Law Firm to Shapiro for $39,500. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Litman v. LitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Segrete v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peroff v. Liddy, Sullivan, Galway, Begler & Peroff, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Pettingell v. Morrison, Mahoney & MillerMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996