State v. Peterson
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This case presents the question whether a defendant, who is successful as the prevailing party on appeal in a criminal action, is entitled to a recovery against the state of costs incurred in the appeal. Answering the question in the negative, we uphold the order of the district court denying the recovery of such costs.
The case comes to us with the following background. Patricia Peterson was found guilty, by a jury in the magistrate division, of driving while under the influence. She appealed to the district court; the conviction was set aside and the case was remanded…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HartwigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- State v. AmsdenOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Boykin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SpurrIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. RollIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CallaghanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Rebecca Lee Ahlers-SchaperIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.