State v. Thompson
Idaho Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The named defendant was charged with multiple counts of delivery of a controlled substance. He retained counsel and entered a not guilty plea. Defense counsel conducted attempts at discovery well in advance of a trial which proceeded no further than selection of a jury. Shortly before the trial date defense counsel filed a motion in limine which claimed prejudice by reason of the State’s failure in regard to discovery. The trial court found such failure was factually established, and imposed a monetary sanction on the State. The State has appealed the imposition of that sanction.1
The 1969…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Chastain's, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. SpurrIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. PetersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. StradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. BicknellIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. VondenkampIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. CallaghanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.