Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1990No. 16941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The named defendant was charged with multiple counts of delivery of a controlled substance. He retained counsel and entered a not guilty plea. Defense counsel conducted attempts at discovery well in advance of a trial which proceeded no further than selection of a jury. Shortly before the trial date defense counsel filed a motion in limine which claimed prejudice by reason of the State’s failure in regard to discovery. The trial court found such failure was factually established, and imposed a monetary sanction on the State. The State has appealed the imposition of that sanction.1

The 1969…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Chastain's, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. SpurrIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. PetersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. StradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State v. BicknellIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. VondenkampIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. CallaghanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API