Legal Opinion

Dunn v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1984No. 07-84-0085-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents the question whether a defendant, who has paid the fee for a transcription of the court reporter’s notes included in the record on a successful appeal from his conviction, is entitled, after dismissal of the remanded cause by the trial court, to have the amount paid taxed to the county or to the State upon a motion to retax costs. Answering the question in the negative, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to retax costs filed in that court and overrule the similar motion filed in this Court.

A Gray County jury found that appellant Joe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quarles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Dunn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Busby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  2. State v. PetersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Donald L. Busby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1993
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API