State v. Roll

SILAK, Judge.

Richard Roll appeals from a judgment of conviction under City of Notus Ordinance No. 126 for failing to remove rubbish from his property. We reverse.

The facts of the case are as follows. On November 25, 1986, the City of Notus filed a complaint against Roll for alleged violation of Notus City Ordinance No. 126 (the “ordinance”). 1 The complaint alleged that “on or about the 24th day of November, 1986,” Roll had “willfully, intentionally and unlawfully refuse [sic] to remove rubbish, refuse and waste matter of everykind [sic] or nature from his real property ... after written…