Legal Opinion

Frugard v. Pritchard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1994No. 479PA93PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

We agree with the Court of Appeals that it was error to exclude evidence of the worker’s compensation payments made to the plaintiff in Virginia. The accident occurred in North Carolina and the substantive law of this state governs. Braxton v. Anco Electric Inc., 330 N.C. 124, 409 S.E.2d 914 (1991). The law of the forum, in this case North Carolina, governs as to the admissibility of evidence. Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp., 283 N.C. 423, 196 S.E.2d 711 (1973). 1 Brandis and Broun, North Carolina Evidence § 1 (4th ed. (1993). The defendants argue that N.C.G.S. § 97-10.2(e)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tennessee Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Spivey v. Babcock & Wilcox CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Darden v. BoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Leonard v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Braxton v. Anco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Fabrikant v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Davis v. Durham Mental Health/Development Disabilities/Substance Abuse Area AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Songwooyarn Trading Co. v. Sox Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. MalachiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. In Re Foreclosure of Real PropertyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API