Legal Opinion

Darden v. Bone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1961No. 318PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C.J.

Careful consideration of the nineteen groupings of assignments of error and purported assignments of error set out in the instant case on appeal fails to reveal error for which the judgment of Superior Court should be disturbed. Those properly presented will be expressly considered.

Assignment of Error No. 4 relates to denial by the court of motion of defendant for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence. In this connection the record and case on appeal fail to show that,an exception was taken to the ruling of the court.

“Exceptions which appear nowhere in the record…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Thompson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. . DilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Frugard v. PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API