Legal Opinion

Spivey v. Babcock & Wilcox Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1965No. 195PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

Plaintiff, an employee of an independent contractor who had undertaken to install plumbing fixtures on defendant’s premises, was an invitee of defendant. Pafford v. Construction Co., 217 N.C. 730, 9 S.E. 2d 408; 2 Harper & James, Torts § 27.12 at p. 1481 (1956 Ed.). Defendant’s duty to plaintiff, therefore, was one of due care under all the circumstances. The general rule is stated in Deaton v. Elon College, 226 N.C. 433, 438, 38 S.E. 2d 561, 565:

“The owner is not responsible to an independent contractor for injuries from defects or dangers of which the contractor knew or should have known,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Deaton v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Deaton v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Revis v. OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Powers v. TempleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. Cates v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Byers v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Frugard v. PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Maness v. Fowler-Jones Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API