People v. Crilley
New York Supreme Court
CERTIORARI to the oyer and terminer of the county of Dutchess, to remove a conviction of the defendant upon an indictment for a violation of the excise law.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, S. B. Strong, J.
The defendant was tried on an indictment for a violation of the 15th section of the title *247of the revised statutes, relative to excise and the regulation of taverns and groceries. (1 R. S. 680.) That section is in the following words : “ Whoever shall sell any strong or spirituous liquors, or any wines, in any quantity less than five gallons at a time, "without having a license therefor, granted as herein directed, shall forfeit twenty-five dollars.” The 25th section declares that all offenses against the provisions of that title shall be deemed misdemeanors. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nevin v. LadueCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
- Nevin v. LadueNew York Supreme Court · 1846
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pennell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Espey v. Convenience MarketersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- In re McDonoughDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1892
- State ex rel. Bash v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.