Legal Opinion

Nevin v. Ladue

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1846PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the Putnam common pleas. Ladue and Nelson, as overseers of the poor of Phillipstown, sued Nevin before a justice of the peace in debt, to recover a penalty of ,$25 for selling-strong or spirituous liquors in a less quantity than five gallons at a time without having a license therefor, contrary to 1 R. S. 680, § 15. The declaration was in the form allowed in declaring upon penal statutes. The defendant pleaded the general issue.

Read the full summary

Error to the Putnam common pleas. Ladue and Nelson, as overseers of the poor of Phillipstown, sued Nevin before a justice of the peace in debt, to recover a penalty of ,$25 for selling-strong or spirituous liquors in a less quantity than five gallons at a time without having a license therefor, contrary to 1 R. S. 680, § 15. The declaration was in the form allowed in declaring upon penal statutes. The defendant pleaded the general issue. On the trial the defendant, as the return states, “ being charged by the plaintiffs with the sale of ale, strong beer or fermented beer, without a license…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Jewett, J.

This case involves a question upon the true construction of the statute. (1 R. S. 680, § 15.) It is in these words, “ Whoever shall sell any strong or spirituous liquors, or any wines, in any quantity less than five gallons at a time, without having a license therefor, granted as herein directed, shall forfeit twenty-five dollars.” If ale or strong beer answers the description of strong or spirituous liquors, the action was well sustained. I am unable to entertain a doubt but that both come within the definition of strong or spirituous liquors. Beer is defined by…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Blatz v. . RohrbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. The Bd. of Commr's of Excise of Tompkins Cty. v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. In re McDonoughDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1892
  5. People v. CrilleyNew York Supreme Court · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API