Legal Opinion

Pennell v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1909PublishedCited by 23 opinions

ERROR to review a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: Jakes O’Neill, Judge. among other authorities, secs. 1565, 1565c, Stats. (1898) ; ch. 284, Laws of 1883; Jones, Ev. (2d ed.) § 128 (129) ; Briffitt v. State, 58 Wis. 39, 16 N. W. 39; Brotan v. Piper, 91 U. S. 37; Stoner v. State, 5 Oa. App. 716, 63 S. E. 602; Blatz v. Bohr-bachj 116 N. Y. 450, 22 N. E. 1049; 57 Cent. Law J. 310; State v. Laffer, 38 Iowa, 422; Hardwiclc v. Slate, 55 Tex.

Read the full summary

ERROR to review a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: Jakes O’Neill, Judge. among other authorities, secs. 1565, 1565c, Stats. (1898) ; ch. 284, Laws of 1883; Jones, Ev. (2d ed.) § 128 (129) ; Briffitt v. State, 58 Wis. 39, 16 N. W. 39; Brotan v. Piper, 91 U. S. 37; Stoner v. State, 5 Oa. App. 716, 63 S. E. 602; Blatz v. Bohr-bachj 116 N. Y. 450, 22 N. E. 1049; 57 Cent. Law J. 310; State v. Laffer, 38 Iowa, 422; Hardwiclc v. Slate, 55 Tex. Orim. 140, 114 S. W. 832; State v. Giersch, 98 N. 0. 720, 4 S. E. 193; Connolly v. Atlanta, 79 Ga. 664, 4 S. E. 263. and oral argument by Mr.…

1Opinion of the CourtTiMUN, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted upon a ■charge of having,' on November 28, 1908, sold certain spirituous, malt, ardent, and intoxicating liquors and drinks in the city of Viroqua, contrary to a vote of the qualified electors of 'that city at an election held April 7, 1908, pursuant to secs. 1565a., 15655, Stats. (1898). When the case was called and ■ready for trial the following stipulation was made between the attorneys for the respective parties: ''

“(1) That all the formal allegations of the complaint with relation to the election and negativing, the right of the defendant to vend,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Booth v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Eaves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Briffitt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. State v. Fargo Bottling Works Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. In Re SpeerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State v. EbelingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API