Legal Opinion
Lisec v. United Airlines, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 2, 1992No. H008551PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Pursuant to a judgment awarding damages for wrongful termination, appellant United Airlines, Inc. (hereafter, United), paid the amount of the judgment minus withholdings for state and federal income and Social Security taxes. The recipients, respondents James K. Lisec and Krishan K. Jagga, 1 refused to acknowledge full satisfaction of the judgment, claiming that the damages were neither wages nor earned income and therefore were not subject to withholding. Appellants Richard J. Ferris and United appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel acknowledgement of full…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Royce Ainsworth v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kgm Harvesting Co. v. Fresth NetworkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Davis v. Los Angeles Unified School District Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Davis v. LAUSD PERSONNEL COM'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. StoreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Sang-Hoon Kim v. Monmouth CollegeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.