Legal Opinion
Kgm Harvesting Co. v. Fresth Network
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1995No. H011702PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COTTLE, P. J.
California lettuce grower and distributor KGM Harvesting Company (hereafter seller) had a contract to deliver 14 loads of lettuce each week to Ohio lettuce broker Fresh Network (hereafter buyer). When the price of lettuce rose dramatically in May and June 1991, seller refused to deliver the required quantity of lettuce to buyer. Buyer then purchased lettuce on the open market in order to fulfill its contractual obligations to third parties. After a trial, the jury awarded buyer damages in an amount equal to the difference between the contract price and the price buyer was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Esgro Central, Inc. v. General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Chesapeake Industries, Inc. v. Togova Entreprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schwartz v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Bullock v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Wisper Corp. v. California Commerce BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Collins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.