Legal Opinion

McClure v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1991No. 89-C-11288 & 90-C-11651 CA A66008 (Control) & A66410PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgments dismissing his two petitions for writs of habeas corpus. He contends that he can collaterally attack his judgment of conviction by a habeas corpus proceeding in which he alleges that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial, on appeal and in a previous post-conviction proceeding. We hold that he is barred from collaterally attacking his conviction, and affirm.

Plaintiff was convicted in 1983 of rape, sodomy, kidnapping and robbery. After an unsuccessful appeal, he filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Barber v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Barber v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Delaney v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Atkeson v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Temple v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Miller v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Elkins v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Combs v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Bates v. CzerniakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API