Legal Opinion

Rulli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1992No. C0-91-785PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

On appeal from an award of attorney’s fees for defense in a civil action, we hold that the intentional injury exclusion in the homeowner’s policy, as a matter of law, absolves the insurer of its duty to defend.

FACTS

State Farm Insurance Co. refused to defend Angelo Rulli in a suit brought against him by Shirley Kresko on the ground that Kresko alleged causes of action outside the coverage of Rulli’s homeowner’s insurance. Kresko alleged that Rulli kissed and fondled her, attempted to remove her clothing, and initiated other nonconsensual personal and physical contact with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kabanuk Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Credit General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Capano Management Co. v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  4. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BarthelemyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Belsom v. BravoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API