Legal Opinion

Lonon v. Pep Boys, Manny, Moe & Jack & General Battery Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1988No. 1680 and 1892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This case involves two consolidated appeals. All appellants appeal from judgment entered on May 26, 1987. The facts and procedural history surrounding the case are as follows.

In April of 1983, John and Rebecca Lonon brought an action against appellee/cross-appellant, The Pep Boys, Manny, Moe and Jack. The complaint alleged that on December 7, 1981, John Lonon purchased from Pep Boys a sixty-month automobile battery which Pep Boys installed in Lo-non’s automobile. When, on December 21, 1981, the battery failed to operate, John Lonon attempted to boost or jump-start it from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Brandimarti v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Staymates v. ITT Holub IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roselli v. General Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. East Penn Manufacturing Co. v. PinedaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Long v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Stanley WAGNER, Appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO., an Ohio Corporation, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Raskin v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API