Legal Opinion

Bradner v. Woods

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1939No. Civ. 12054PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrail, P. J.

—This is an appeal by defendant, as executrix, from a judgment for the sum of $5,640.27 on a rejected claim against the estate.

For some time prior to the death of Charles Lewis Woods, the said Woods and a Mr. Rumbold were partners engaged in the business of buying and selling gasoline, stove oil and motor fuel. At the time of the death of Mr. Woods such partnership was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $25,173.31.

For a period of ten days thereafter Mr. Rumbold conducted the business and was personally and solely liable therefor. He bought merchandise from the plaintiff in the amount of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Murdock v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ohio Electric Car Co. v. Le SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Orlopp v. Willardson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Davidson v. TildenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API