Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Tilden
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1978No. Civ. 17564PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.
Suing for the value of engineering and surveying services performed, plaintiffs recovered judgment for $9,224.97 against defendants Marshall Tilden and Marion W. Tilden. Defendants appeal.
The dispositive question is whether the evidence establishes the existence of one book account or two between the parties. If only one book account existed, plaintiffs’ action was timely filed; if there were two book accounts, plaintiffs’ action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
Facts
In March 1967, defendants employed J. F. Davidson Associates to perform…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ellingson v. Walsh, O'Connor & BarnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Bradley v. HarknessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Tuller v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Irvine & Muir Lumber Co. v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- R.N.C., Inc. v. TsegeletosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Zapara v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994