Legal Opinion
Chicago Title Insurance v. Runkel Abstract & Title Co.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 6, 2009No. 08-cv-341-bbcPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
In this civil action for monetary relief, plaintiff Chicago Title Insurance Company alleges that defendant Runkel Abstract & Title Company breached its agency agreement with plaintiff when it failed to exempt a properly recorded restrictive covenant from a title insurance commitment that it issued on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks indemnity from defendant for its losses resulting from the breach. Jurisdiction is present. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Dkt. ## 18 and 25. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Faye M. Oest v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Market Street Associates Limited Partnership and William Orenstein v. Dale FreyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Shannon Kampmier v. Emeritus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.