Legal Opinion
McQuillion v. Duncan
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 27, 2003No. CV 98-3680 DT(JWJ)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
TEVRIZIAN, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus along with the Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment and attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED that the State’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment is denied and that petitioner be released from custody pursuant to this Court’s January 27, 2003 Judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jeffrey Welton Nunes v. G.A. Mueller, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Carrie Gentry v. Doris Deuth, Warden, Kentucky Correctional Institute for WomenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- McQuillion v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Carl D. McQuillion v. William Duncan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- McQUILLION v. SCHWARZENEGGERCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.