Prokop v. Bedford Waist & Dress Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal, by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
The facts which the jury was warranted in finding are that the plaintiff was employed as a pattern maker by the defendant on Monday, September 10, 1917, on trial for one week. On the following Saturday, the fifteenth, the defendant said to plaintiff “ You will have to give me another week’s time,” to wMch plaintiff assented. On the succeeding Saturday, *574the twenty-second of September, before noon, the defendant said to plaintiff: “ ‘ I want a man for the whole year. Ton will have the whole year a job with me; yon go ahead,’ and so I did.” Plaintiff continued his work on the Saturday morning of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Marvin v. . MarvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Russell v. SladeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
- People ex rel. Collier v. Sheriff of BroomeNew York Supreme Court · 1838
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goon v. Fu Manchu's Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- In re CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Lohak v. Woodmere Club, Inc.Long Beach City Court · 1959
- Silverstein v. LehrfeldCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943