Legal Opinion

Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City Railroad

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1897PublishedCited by 63 opinions

Motion for a reargument. (See 153 27. Y. 540.)

1Opinion of the CourtVann, J.

This motion for a reargument is based on the possibility that the court may have overlooked one of the points presented both orally and in writing on the argument. This possibility is founded on the fact that the point is not discussed by the court in its opinion, but, as we have held, that fact gives rise to no such inference in any case, and in this case it is expressly stated that the reason for not adopting the opinion of the Appellate Division, which, as reported, discusses the point supposed to have been overlooked, was to avert further litigation by deciding a question that, although…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kamp v. . KampNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. In the Matter, Etc., of Kings Co. Elev. Ry. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Matter of U.E.R.R. Co. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Monroe v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. People Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Race v. . KrumNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API