Legal Opinion

Mello v. Board of Water Supply

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1934No. 2117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BANKS, J.

This is a motion to quash a bill of exceptions. The ground of the motion is that the exceptions are too general to justify a review of the case by this court. The action out of which the question presented arises is in assumpsit in which the plaintiff sought to recover from the defendants a specified amount. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence and after he had rested the defendants recalled two of plaintiff’s witnesses for further cross-examination. Upon the conclusion of this cross-examination the defendants moved for a judgment on the pleadings on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Brown v. WarrenNevada Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Makainai v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chai Ex Rel. Chai v. MurataHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Keltz v. Cereal & Fruit Products, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wixom v. GilesHawaii Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Woodward v. AuyongHawaii Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API