Mello v. Board of Water Supply
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
BANKS, J.
This is a motion to quash a bill of exceptions. The ground of the motion is that the exceptions are too general to justify a review of the case by this court. The action out of which the question presented arises is in assumpsit in which the plaintiff sought to recover from the defendants a specified amount. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence and after he had rested the defendants recalled two of plaintiff’s witnesses for further cross-examination. Upon the conclusion of this cross-examination the defendants moved for a judgment on the pleadings on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Brown v. WarrenNevada Supreme Court · 1881
- Makainai v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chai Ex Rel. Chai v. MurataHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
- Keltz v. Cereal & Fruit Products, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1937
- Wixom v. GilesHawaii Supreme Court · 1950
- Woodward v. AuyongHawaii Supreme Court · 1937