Legal Opinion

Keltz v. Cereal & Fruit Products, Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1937No. 2324PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss a bill of exceptions. The motion challenges the sufficiency of exceptions that were taken to the written decision and the judgment of the court below on the ground that they are too general to present to this court any specific question of law.

The exception to the written decision is as follows: “Comes now Clinton O. Keltz, Claimant herein, by J. Donovan Flint and Joseph Y. Esposito, his Attorneys-at-Law, and excepts to the Written Decision of the Court heretofore entered.”

The exception to the judgment is as follows: “Comes now Clinton O. Keltz, Claimant herein, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mello v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API