Chai Ex Rel. Chai v. Murata
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
BANKS, J.
By written stipulation of the parties which appears in the record the case herein decided was submitted for decision to the court with only two of its justices sitting.
This is a case in which the court below entered a judgment of nonsuit in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff.
It is conceded that the judgment was properly entered as to Ryoichi Murata and Masaiehi Kobayashi, two of the defendants, but it is contended that it was erroneously entered as to Shige Murata, the third defendant. A review of the judgment is sought by a bill of exceptions.
It…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bibb's Adm'r v. N. & W. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1891
- Jensen v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Claim for Compensation of Tomondong v. IkezakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1932
- Mello v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994