Legal Opinion

Chai Ex Rel. Chai v. Murata

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1936No. 2214PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BANKS, J.

By written stipulation of the parties which appears in the record the case herein decided was submitted for decision to the court with only two of its justices sitting.

This is a case in which the court below entered a judgment of nonsuit in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff.

It is conceded that the judgment was properly entered as to Ryoichi Murata and Masaiehi Kobayashi, two of the defendants, but it is contended that it was erroneously entered as to Shige Murata, the third defendant. A review of the judgment is sought by a bill of exceptions.

It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bibb's Adm'r v. N. & W. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1891
  2. Jensen v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Claim for Compensation of Tomondong v. IkezakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Mello v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API