Legal Opinion
Schine v. Schine
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1966No. 65 Civ. 3526PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FRANKEL, District Judge.
On February 7, 1966, Judge Weinfeld denied defendants’ motions t© dismiss and for summary judgment. Schine v. Schine, D.C., 250 F.Supp. 822. The basis for the summary judgment motion was the release delivered by plaintiffs at the closing of the sale to which the lawsuit relates. In a characteristically cogent opinion which makes a restatement of the pleaded facts superfluous here, Judge Weinfeld held that the parol evidence rule did not foreclose testimony to establish “the scope of the release and the matters to which it was intended to apply * Id. at 826.
A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Radio Corp. of America v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Schine v. SchineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bellefonte Re Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Argonaut Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Universal Reinsurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Argonaut Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Jadoff v. GleasonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1991
- County Vanlines Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Mittendorf v. JR Williston & Beane IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.