Legal Opinion

Winbun v. Moore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2001No. 68967-9PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

Petitioner Gail Winbun sought review of a Court of Appeals’ decision reversing a jury verdict which awarded her damages for negligent medical care provided by Dr. Stephen Epstein. Finding that there is substantial evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict that the cause of action was timely filed, we reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the trial court’s judgment against Epstein.

ISSUES

This case presents the following issues:(1) Whether there is substantial evidence that the plaintiff commenced her professional negligence action against *209Epstein within one year of the date that she…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Flowers v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. StubbsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. StubbsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Winbun v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API