Smithers v. Brunkhorst
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
Appellant asserts as error the rendition of judgment as upon default because of a lack of personal service of the summons, and a failure to give eight days’ notice of assessment of damages as required by sec. 2891, Stats. The proof of service of summons does not disclose a valid personal or substituted service. The affidavit of the constable recites that he made service “by delivering to and *532leaving with the wife of the defendant a true copy thereof,” but fails to disclose that it was left at the usual place of abode of the defendant, as required by sec. 2636, Stats. It does not seem…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emery v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McGinleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Bartelt v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Haberman v. GasserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Tomlinson v. WallaceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Midwest Developers v. Goma Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Nelson v. Restaurants of Iowa, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Snow v. MilnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Shell Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.