Legal Opinion
Snow v. Milner
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 17, 1963No. 14049PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
Appellees, Robert W. Milner, Jr., and Foy Melton, defendants in the trial court, attacked the petition of Billy D. Snow, appellant and plaintiff in the trial court, by exceptions and, prior to securing a final ruling thereon, presented to the court a motion for summary judgment in which they contended that the petition failed to state a cause of action. This position was sustained by the trial court and this appeal resulted.
It is the generally accepted rule that pleadings may be so faulty upon their face as to justify the rendition of a summary judgment. Brownson v. New, 259…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Suprise v. Dekock, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Knight v. CaloudasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Ron Suprise and Maria Estela Suprise v. Jim Dekock, Jr. and Pat Edwards, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002