Bartelt v. Braunsdorf
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Sheboygcm County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. The circuit court directed the jury to assess the plaintiffs damages at $100, and from a judgment accordingly in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Oiítoít, J.
The complaint charges a breach of the covenant of seizin in a deed conveying ninety-five acres of land for a valuable consideration, by reason of the defendant, the grantor, not having title to thirtj''-five acres of said land when the deed was given. There was- no answer, and the defendant appeared and was present at the assessment of the damages by a jury, and rightfully, so far as appears from the record in this court. The defendant objected to any evidence on the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action, and the particular defect seems to have been pointed out…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Messer v. OestreichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Jenkins v. SteankaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Mick v. MickNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Thompson v. LumleyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
- Saltus v. KipThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Docter v. HellbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Semple v. WhortonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Flygare v. BrundageWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- Smithers v. BrunkhorstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.