Neuhalfen v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Scott Neuhalfen appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) order requiring him to forfeit future benefits relating to his claim and to reimburse $11,500.47 for benefits WSI previously paid. We conclude a reasoning mind reasonably could have concluded Neuhalfen made false statements sufficiently material to support both forfeiture of future benefits and reimbursement of benefits paid. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On March 30, 2006, Neuhalfen submitted a claim for benefits to WSI, asserting that he injured his lower back while employed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Hausauer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Roberts v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Dean v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Welch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Miller v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009