Legal Opinion

Neuhalfen v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2009No. 20080175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Scott Neuhalfen appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) order requiring him to forfeit future benefits relating to his claim and to reimburse $11,500.47 for benefits WSI previously paid. We conclude a reasoning mind reasonably could have concluded Neuhalfen made false statements sufficiently material to support both forfeiture of future benefits and reimbursement of benefits paid. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On March 30, 2006, Neuhalfen submitted a claim for benefits to WSI, asserting that he injured his lower back while employed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hausauer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Roberts v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dean v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Welch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Miller v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API