Legal Opinion
Larson v. Hendrickson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 14, 1986No. C2-86-675PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Respondents brought suit against appellant Pearson in December 1984. The summons and complaint were served by substitute service on a tenant in Pearson’s Minnesota home. In October 1985 Pearson moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and insufficient service of process pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 4.03(a) and 12.02(2). The trial court denied Pearson’s motion, and Pearson’s petition for discretionary review was granted. We affirm.
FACTS
Pearson lived on Interlachen Drive in Ham Lake, Minnesota, and was a resident of this state for approximately eight…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Rinker v. RinkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KirkevoldDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- Hansen v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Rask v. American Federation of LaborSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
3Cited by18 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Amdahl v. Stonewall Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.