Legal Opinion
Attruia v. Attruia
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff brought an action under § 3796 of the General Statutes to recover wages for overtime work claimed to be due him from the defendant by virtue of chapter 180 of the General Statutes, known as the Minimum Wage Act. The defendant answered denying liability under the act and alleging that part of the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations, and he counterclaimed for a debt of $103.21. The plaintiff admitted this debt to the defendant. The court rendered judgment for the defendant on the complaint, and on the counterclaim to recover $131.95 damages. The view which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Bridgeman v. City of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Camp v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- McWilliams v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Martyn v. DonlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- West v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Arvee Construction Co. v. ArdolinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.