Legal Opinion

Union Trust Co. Ex Rel. Carter v. Carey

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1943No. 2519PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LE BARON, J.

This is an action of assumpsit for the balance due upon a promissory note. After trial the jury returned a verdict against the defendants, who appeal to this court.

The facts are not in dispute. On September 24, 1934, the defendants executed a promissory note and its securing mortgage, and delivered both to the plaintiff. On December 23, 1936, the mortgage was foreclosed for a default of interest. payments. The plaintiff purchased the mortgaged property and the proceeds of sale were applied to the reduction of the indebtedness represented by the note in suit.

T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Molokai Ranch, Ltd. v. MorrisHawaii Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Vierra v. ShipmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Trousseau v. CartwrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Boston Heating Co. v. Middleborough Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Lum Wai v. Hong HoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lennen & Newell, Inc. v. Clark Enterprises, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Guaschino v. Eucalyptus, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Harper v. FreemanHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Miyasaki v. NobrigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API