Legal Opinion

Miyasaki v. Nobriga

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1943No. 2514Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LE BARON, J.

In an action of assumpsit for milk delivered to the defendant, the defendant answered by way of recoupment, setting up damages occasioned by the plaintiff’s breach of the contract under which the milk was delivered. The district magistrate, after a trial, disallowed the recoupment claim and entered judgment against the defendant in the full amount prayed for in the plaintiff’s suit.

The defendant appeals on points of law which are directed against the magistrate’s ruling. They are that the magistrate erred in ruling as a matter of law (1) that the contract…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Trust Co. Ex Rel. Carter v. CareyHawaii Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API